| A Thai Stands Up for Sitting Down |
|
|
| Written by Our Correspondent | |
| Thursday, 24 April 2008 | |
|
An anti-coup activist faces insult charges for refusing to stand for the king’s anthem before a movie
Thailand imported the ritual from Britain, which in the 1910s regularly showed silent clips of King George V to the tune of “God Save the King" being played in theaters to whip up nationalist sentiment during World War I. The Brits scrapped the practice in the 1960s, but Thais started playing the Royal Anthem before movies in the 1970s and continue to do so today. The social pressure to stand up is immense. So Chotisak Onsoong, a 27-year-old political activist who opposes the 2006 royalist coup, knew he would get dirty looks and comments when he remained seated in protest, as he normally does when attending a film. But even he was surprised last September when fellow moviegoer Nawamin Witthayakul, 40, aggressively told him to stand up for the song at a movie theater in Bangkok's ritzy Central World shopping mall. According to Chotisak, Navawamin started yelling in the theater, saying, "If you are really Thai, why don't you stand up?" He then threw his popcorn and a bottle of water at Chotisak.
Aggrieved, Chotisak found a policeman and sought to press
charges against Nawarmin. But Nawarmin turned the tables on Chotisak, filing a lèse
majesté complaint against him. Police have now followed suit, pressing formal
charges against Chotisak on Tuesday. A Swiss man was sentenced to 10 years in prison in March 2007 for throwing paint on Bhumibol's picture in Chiang Mai. He received a pardon from the king. But as far as lèse majesté cases go, Chotisak's is more significant. Rather than involving politicians or foreigners, his case involves a Thai consciously rebelling against nationalist and royalist propaganda. Sitting down during the anthem is my right to freedom of expression," Chotisak said in an interview through a translator. "The law doesn't say you must stand up; it says can you stand up. So it's not something that you must do." Chotisak's case has attracted quite a bit of media attention, which is unusual for a lèse majesté case. While local newspapers typically only run wire stories about the cases in order to avoid compounding the “crime” with their own reporting, the Bangkok Post, Thailand's leading English-language daily, smacked the story on Page 1 with a picture, graphic and sidebar. About 20 other news outlets covered Chotisak’s appearance at the police station. According to the Bangkok Post, in addition to lèse majesté, Chotisak may have violated the 1942 National Culture Act passed under a military dictator. It states: "Individuals must pay their respects to the national anthem, the Royal anthem and other anthems which are played at an official service, social ceremony or entertainment venue." Violators face a measly 100 baht fine (US$3.17) or up to a month in prison. Chotisak says he wants laws passed under military regimes to be scrapped. He also makes a routine practice of disregarding the national anthem, which is played on radios, TV stations and public places at 8 am and 6 pm every day. "The lèse majesté law falls under the constitution, which says that all Thais have the right to freedom of expression," said Chotisak. "Therefore, the lèse majesté law is unconstitutional." The lèse majesté law has always been a touchy subject, mostly because anyone can bring a case without any input from the king himself. Moreover, no politician would dare propose scrapping the law, and police and prosecutors often feel the need to follow through on the charges out of fear that they might actually be violating the law by not doing so. This all made more difficult since it can barely be discussed in public. "Somehow, Thai society has dead-ended itself, unable to go forward or back, unable to even address the extremely problematic nature of this law," David Streckfuss, one of the foremost scholars on the law, wrote last year. "Thai society has narrowed its options, leaving a single unavoidable logic of suppression: the law protects the monarchy. Anyone who questions the law must not care about protecting the monarchy. Such a person must be disloyal to the monarchy, and must be suppressed." Whereas most caught up in the odd tangle of a lèse majesté charge just hope the issues goes away quietly, Chotisak wants the publicity. He is willing to become a martyr for a cause he believes in, even if it means going to jail for not standing up in a movie theater. "He's very brave," said a friend of Chotisak. "Young student activists, think tank activists and some people in the general public agree with him but they don't have the guts to publicize the issue as much as him."
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments
(29)
to: Arthur Borges
written by Rodent , June 11, 2008
I'm not Thaksin's supporter or fan or anything, but I want you to present your prove that Thaksin really own those estate, the reason I ask for this is because there are so many mud spilling from ASTV and Manager group that so many of their, so call, news are bunch of BS that even a 10 years old find it hard to believe.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by Rodent , June 11, 2008
John Edward, what that have been done for only 30 years is hardly called as "social norm" believe me, when my mom was 15 she never have to stand in the cinema. This culture of standing in cinema is very recent if you compare to other culture practices.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Thai power brokers
written by CJ Hinke, Freedom Against Cens , May 01, 2008
I don't think the power brokers are monarchists particularly; it is merely convenient to appear loyal to the Royals. This is a very effective tool to suppress dissent and create a climate of fear. I've just noticed Wise Kwai's film page is closing down comments because he's afraid
Votes: +0
Readers may be interested in reading my further comments on this issue. report abuse
vote down
vote up
Sarkozy
written by dre , April 30, 2008
Also, some monkey in Zimbabwe and Cambodia can now fly.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Sarkozy
written by dre , April 30, 2008
To Arthur Borges.
Votes: +0
Thank your for revealing the secret. It's also open secrets that Bush owns prositute houses in Iran and Gordon Brown controls 5 massage parlors in Bangkok. report abuse
vote down
vote up
Dear Adam
written by Arthur Borges , April 29, 2008
It's an open secret that Thaksin has 20 "country estates" in northern Thailand that are in fact drug processing factories.
Votes: +0
Who is he selling to? Answer that and you know who wants him in power. Know also that the king is promoting an economy of self-sufficiency in order to ease the lot of the poorest. So if Thaksin does not have a direct hand in any slander, however grounded, it is safe to label the slandering party as a fellow traveler of Thaksin's. report abuse
vote down
vote up
cnc
written by hummyaii , April 29, 2008
SPTHISAK,YOU ARE STUPID AND DUMMY ,ONLY 5 MIN SONG .WHY U CAN'T STAND UP .PLEAS SOME POLICE KILL THAT SUKER .ASS HOLE
Votes: -1
report abuse
vote down
vote up
FREE THINKING, NO STUPIDITY PLEASE
written by DARK MOON , April 29, 2008
In democratic kingdom, people all have their own right to think or act differently without disturbing others. This news is awesome because it lets the world know what's been happening in Thailand. Chotisak is my hero...He just wants to see a movie peacefully for Christ sake...
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Thaksin=Bush
written by don , April 27, 2008
As an expat Thaksin did some good things for Thailand, but good things are undermined by the extream corruption by him and his family. Just like Bush he thinks he is above the law or make them up to meet ur wants. Long live the King.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Hey, hold on
written by Teeranai Charuvastra , April 26, 2008
If you want to raise the issue about "social norms" or whatever, do you define the "tradition" which has been imposed (by force of laws) for only 40 years a "social norms"??
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
To JF Lee
written by Adam , April 26, 2008
"How can anyone know what goes on in HM the King's head? We cannot."
Votes: +0
Mr JF Lee, that alone contradicts with the rest of your little apologetic. You look at his words, I look at his actions. You ascribe responsibility to "the monarchists" but who are these vague people you so convenient shift the blame to? Last time I checked, Thais loved their King, not the monarchists, and if the King were to say so, he could easily have removed "the monarchists" from power. I don't see a reason why this apparently genius individual can be a victim and remain a victim for 60 years especially after many monarchists would have long been dead. And, especially, after he has been able to cultivate a cult of personality, personal networks, exploit Thai political infighting, and create a direct link with his people (without the hamper of any apparent "monarchists", the King's words are clearly transmitted and treated as holy, almost). Granted, he initially was a puppet, but throughout the 60s and 70s he has formed his own networks as the old princes died off and has had considerable power and influence, or would you disagree that he has not the power and influence? Then again, you base your judgment of him based on a tinted view of the King as benign regardless of the actual evidence (the historical evidence is very important. I hope you will be able to fill in the gaps in his official biography). Perhaps if you didn't view the issue based on the assumption that "The King is good regardless" maybe you would have a different opinion regarding these "monarchists", who, the first and foremost, is the King himself. report abuse
vote down
vote up
an unnecessary law
written by San Neil , April 26, 2008
If the king has done only good things for Thailand. I believe such an outmoded law will definately be unnecessary. It might be because of the propaganda that has been sucessfully used for years been exposed. Internet plays a vital role in letting many people getting the informations they do not have in the newspaper and the television. This is the real reason why more and more such news come out. I think its time for someone to change facing extinct.
Votes: +1
report abuse
vote down
vote up
I greatly admire HM the King
written by John Francis Lee , April 25, 2008
I think it is important to distinguish between HM the King, the monarchy, and the monarchists. It seems to me that HM the King is as much a victim of the monarchists as Chotisak.
Votes: +0
The first thought in his mind when he took the throne had to have been, "These guys have just murdered my brother, King Ananda, Rama VIII". HM said as much in his birthday speech in 2005, during which he also condemned lese majeste laws : "Before I was the King, I regretted many times but after I became the King, the Thai King, which foreigners call the King, I understand that I hardly do wrong because I am careful. If I am not careful, I would have died. Must be careful, if not then I would die. This is natural for politics or for being in the public eye. The public eye can kill. If we are not careful, we die." The lee majeste laws are a license to imprison people without specifying the crime with which they are charged. To specify the charge is to commit the crime anew. All proceedings after the charge is made are secret. Talk about being disappeared in plain view! The lese majeste law is the perfect tool of the dictatorship, aka the monarchists. The monarchy is essential because it provides the monarchists with their deus ex machina, their extralegal means to do anything, anywhere, to anyone, at any time in the unassailable name of the monarchy. How can anyone know what goes on in HM the King's head? We cannot. I know that each one of us is born into a matrix of events beyond our control. Life is not the conditions in which we find ourselves, but how we respond to those conditions. Considering everything I know about HM the King I admire him. I am not alone in my admiration for him. It is HM the King that gives the monarchy a good name, and allows the monarchists to continue to exist, in my humble opinion. When the monarchy is no longer headed by HM the King things may be very different for the monarchists and their monarchy. People notice that HM the King never smiles. I think he has every reason not to smile. Like his brother he is the victim of the monarchists and enjoys not a bit of the power ascribed to him. He denounced the lese majeste laws but of course nothing happened. The people in charge, the monarchists, have no intention of allowing HM the King do away with a weapon that lies so close to the heart of their power. And HM the King was given the ultimate lesson on the ruthlessness of the monarchists before he came to power. He knows that if we are not careful, we die. report abuse
vote down
vote up
To Arthur
written by Adam , April 25, 2008
I don't understand how Thaksin is related to this, Arthur. I for one am no Thaksin fan, but neither am I a fan of the monarchy.
Votes: +0
Its sad to see expats also being deluded by Thai propaganda. So much for better critical thinking, thinking for yourself, and actually finding out more besides the royalist claptrap... report abuse
vote down
vote up
To Mr Edwards
written by Adam , April 25, 2008
On the internet, it is easy to dismiss brainless comments from either side of a debate. But I hope you will consider this response to your argument.
Votes: -1
Yes, nothing says the King is a god. But surely you see the ridiculous efforts the propaganda machine goes on to? The similarities between Thailand and North Korea in this regard is startling. Add to that the lese majeste law and is it any surprise Thai people have many misconceptions about the King? Isn't it any surprise that Thais will only discuss the King positively or view whatever he does positively? Take, for instance, his hardworking-ness. Did you know when he began to tour the provinces? A few years into his reign. If he was so hardworking, how did he find the time for his numerous hobbies and so-called "genius" in sailing, music, painting, etc.? Thais only believe it because they are told such, and without any critical thinking. As a teacher in Thailand you should be aware of that. What you should also know, is that there is an ever-growing crowd of Thais who don't believe such propaganda and see the King for what he actually is. You have to look hard for them because clearly they are suppressed. "I don't think someone can just do it solely for PR purposes for 60 years.Witout good knowledge on any society's overall development and its special identity ,you might fail to really understand it." Again, this is where you've gone wrong. He hasn't been doing it for 60 years. You seem to not understand the nuances of his reign, the periods and the activities he engages in, because the King's reign has not been a homogenous, hardworking 60 years. He did not visit the provinces every year of his reign. "The protest guy have his full right to express his view....but he have to learn to show it with a proper and more civilized way....which is by now he fail to convinced that he did so,in this matter. My concern is ....younger generation demand their right but witout respect to social norms...and even other fellows." Social norms or rights? I say rights have higher priority, which clearly indicate that Thai social norms are not democratic. Your concern should not be the "inappropriate" actions of the protest guy. He was peaceful and did not disturb anyone else's rights. On the other hand, the guy who threw popcorn and verbally abused him is a barbaric animal. report abuse
vote down
vote up
Thaksin
written by Arthur Borges , April 25, 2008
Gee, Thaksin will do anything to discredit the monarchy. And there's always somebody ready to become a human rights martyr and become the next dissident darling of the media.
Votes: +0
And this is only the tip of iceberg of the current, very underhanded, smear campaign afoot in the country. Fact is, the guy is just plain rude. Anyhow: Long Live the King! report abuse
vote down
vote up
Thais are Thai
written by Johny , April 24, 2008
Your king's pretending humble.
Votes: +0
Please check it out your king is the richest person in your country, and even in the world's List........ .................. ..................... .......................... I think you guys have not known those things.... Hahahaaaaa report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by Got , April 24, 2008
"Thai royal family is the main reason why Thailand is still a developing country. This family owns more 1/3 of all the prime land in BKK. Their wealth is estimated to be at least USD 15 billion"
Votes: +0
Yeah, their income and investment companies are exempted from taxes. They probably owe at least 3-4 billion usd in income and capital gain back taxes. They also receive about 100 - 200 million usd in annual donation from corporations and wealthy individuals. report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by Voltaire , April 24, 2008
As a fellow Thai I am saddened to see such laws in my country. Consider two cases:
Votes: +1
1) A person sits down during the playing of the King's anthem 2) A person spray paints the King's portrait in a derogatory manner Of course, case#2 would aghast me the most because he is intentionally insulting the king. Unfortunately for most Thais they cannot see the difference between the two. Ironic that Thailand have people in power who've lied, cheated, and possibly murdered and yet the loudest condemnation will be for the one person whose only crime was to sit still. report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by okay , April 24, 2008
Thai royal family is the main reason why Thailand is still a developing country. This family owns more 1/3 of all the prime land in BKK. Their wealth is estimated to be at least USD 15 billion.
Votes: +1
report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by JOHN EDWARDS , April 24, 2008
I have been in Thailand for more than 16 yrs now with my thai wife ,we both teach at university in BKK/political sciences.
Votes: +0
As I have examines the said laws....nothing says King is God.It's can't help that thais revered their king as if he is a living(or hardworking)god by some aspects of his works. I don't think someone can just do it solely for PR purposes for 60 years.Witout good knowledge on any society's overall development and its special identity ,you might fail to really understand it. The protest guy have his full right to express his view....but he have to learn to show it with a proper and more civilized way....which is by now he fail to convinced that he did so,in this matter. My concern is ....younger generation demand their right but witout respect to social norms...and even other fellows. report abuse
vote down
vote up
poor Thais
written by FD , April 24, 2008
Poor Thais........
Votes: +0
Propaganda is working That's all report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by Wayway , April 24, 2008
His Highness The King of Thailand, commands more respect from both Thais and non-Thais alike than any monarchs on earth. As for Dalai Lama, he is still dreaming he is the King of Tibet when actually he is merely a lapdog to be played around by the West.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by Prism , April 24, 2008
Not a very flattering picture of the royal family...looks like the Adams family!
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Thai King is more than God
written by Micku , April 24, 2008
I think that guy didn't insult everyone. He simply expressed his believe. We can believe in anything with distrubing others. God damn the "Human Right" in Thailand.
Votes: +0
I so know why Thailand remaims "Developing" country. report abuse
vote down
vote up
I don\'t get it
written by Teeranai Charuvastra , April 24, 2008
If the thai royalists are so confident that "everyone loves the king", why do they need such draconian laws to enforce people to show respect to king, and in the same time, punish those that show the slightest sign of thinking differently??
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Editor
written by Keerock Rook , April 24, 2008
Teachers interested in having students identify the fallacy of circular reasoning as in: "Anyone who questions the law must not care about protecting the monarchy. Such a person must be disloyal to the monarchy, and must be suppressed." can find more here: http://ksuweb.kennesaw.edu/~sh...cular.htm.
Votes: +0
Good rules are not easy to make. "Making Patriots in Thailand" - a Learning Foundation Mock Trial explores the characteristics of good rules. The link is http://www.lfslessonsasia.com/...esson.html report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
| The Risk of Travel in AsiaOur Correspondent Full Story |
| Other Articles |
| Freedom of Expression Too Precious to Throw AwayThursday, 04 February 2010 | Alice Poon
In a free society, there will always be more than one single opinion. In a free society, it is accepted that everyone should have an equal right to express his/her opinion without fearing... Full Story |
| Previous posts: |
| From vultures in Delhi, to coups in Pakistan, a journalist's un-edited take on current events |