| Asian Values |
|
|
| Written by Our Correspondent | |
| Saturday, 09 October 2010 | |
Last Friday, on the eve of the award of the Nobel Prize to Chinese dissident Liu Xiaobo, Kishore Mahbubani, a former Singaporean career diplomat and now dean of public practice at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore, spoke at a shipping and offshore conference in Singapore. He had this to say about the Nobel Committee’s picks for the peace prize:"We all respect the Nobel Peace Prize. Most winners deserve the prizes they get. Nobel Prizes by and large reflect the western world view. The winners in Asia are never leaders who brought great change. The man that did more good than anyone was Deng Xiaoping. When he came to power 800 million people were living on less than one dollar a day. Thirty years later on after the results of his reforms, 200 million lived on less than one dollar a day. Six hundred million people were lifted out of poverty. Will he ever get a Nobel Peace Prize? Never. Because of the western world view that the prize must be given to dissidents in Asia. Aung San Suu Kyii (Although she deserves it) The former leader of Korea. What has Obama brought? Where is the peace in Iraq? In Afghanistan? How can you give him a Nobel Peace Prize? He is a wonderful guy but he has achieved nothing. Deng Xiaoping saved 600 million people and he will never get a Nobel Peace Prize. That's why it is important to step outside the western world view." For the record, Muhammad Yunus, the inventor of microcredit, and his Grameen Bank were awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for 2006. Kim Dae-jung, the president of South Korea from 1998 to 2003, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2000.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Hits: 10888 Comments (4)
![]() written by john francis lee, October 09, 2010
Good idea to step outside the Western World View. Bad idea to step into the World View Of the Glorious Lee Leaders. Out of the frying pan and into the fire.
written by thumos, October 10, 2010
I'm sure that kishore, if he can, would also put up his political master LKY for the nobel peace prize if possible!! Guess he belong to the school of thought that the end justify the mean, which in his narrow mind suggest that all dissidents and oppositions should be locked up or exiled so as to bring "peace to the society" and therefore win the nobel peace prize!! WHAT A JERK!!
written by Javier Delgado Rivera, October 10, 2010
Though I cannot disagree more with Mahbubani in other topics (see http://www.economist.com/node/17199884), this time I lean towards Mahbubani reasoning. I never though about Deng Xiaoping in this vein, but from a purely development standpoint, Mr Mahbubani's argument begs some consideration. Unfortunately, Deng's commitment for reform was limited to the economic ground, as his approval of the Tiananmen massacre (which tirelessly Xiaobo tried to avoid), is out of doubt. Consequently, suggesting the legacy of Deng as somehow deserving the Nobel Price risks, to say the least, the reader's head scratch.
Additionally, I think that the high-profile Obama's and Xiaobo's awards were given in a media-savvy light, as if the Nobel Price commission was seeking the mainstream recognition. I equally support what Obama represents as I disgust Xiaobo decade-long imprisonment for daring to share his thoughts. Having said that, I believe that the determination of both colossal figures is not chiefly targeted to the promotion of Peace, so maybe the Nobel Price is not the right platform to cherish their noble endeavours. written by Thomas, Singapore, October 13, 2010
Mahbubani claims that "the winners in Asia are never leaders who brought great change." I wonder how he can be a dean when he somehow forgets that some of these winners, including Liu Xiaobo and Aung San Suu Kyii, either have spent or will spend many years in jail through no fault of their own. Of course it's impossible to change much when you are forced to stay in your house or a prison cell!
If these two winners had actually been allowed to pursue their beliefs, China and Burma could likely have developed into much more just and harmonious societies than they are today. And yes, I do agree that giving the Nobel Peace Prize to Obama was a mistake. But Liu Xiaobo's prize should be considered on its own merits. In this case it's irrelevant whether earlier prizes were justified or not. Write comment
|
| Malaysia's Rigged Electoral SystemPhilip Bowring Full Story |
| Other Articles |