|
With
the US Dollar Index breaking decisively below its long-term support
level, the sun is finally setting on the golden age of American
consumption, just as it begins to rise on Asia. As America’s
economic dominance fades, so too will the faith in the central thesis
that has explained its apparent success and has shaped the majority
of recent economic theory.
At
issue is the belief that a nation can grow and prosper by borrowing
from abroad in order to consume imported goods. To consume at the
pace that it has, America exchanges income-producing assets such as
companies or property, or interest bearing IOUs such as Treasury
notes or mortgage-backed bonds, for foreign-made clothes, toys and
electronics. Economists call these transactions “growth”.
But rather than discovering a new path to prosperity, America has
simply stumbled on a shortcut to financial ruin, and in doing so
appears likely to pass the leadership of the global economy to Asia,
and particularly China.
For
years America has convinced the emerging market countries that their
prosperity is a function of our consumption, which has led, for
instance, to a first-half 2007 trade deficit with China of $176.6
billion in imports against only $35.3 billion in exports, much of
which is for processing by US-linked companies and re-export. It is
argued that export-oriented economies would falter if not for the
insatiable American willingness to consume (a “virtue”
that is assumed to be uniquely American). As the dollar falls into
the abyss, this myth will be shattered.
My
forecast is that over the next two to three years the US dollar index
will fall to 40; half of its current value. As this happens, much of
America’s economic power will be transferred abroad. The chart
below approximates current per capita US dollar GDP for 30 nations,
including the United States, listed in descending order.
|
Luxembourg
|
91,926.63
|
|
Norway
|
76,447.78
|
|
Ireland
|
57,163.07
|
|
Switzerland
|
54,466.77
|
|
Iceland
|
53,532.47
|
|
United
States
|
46,085.15
|
|
Sweden
|
44,454.36
|
|
Netherlands
|
42,762.96
|
|
United
Kingdom
|
41,959.85
|
|
Canada
|
41,347.87
|
|
Australia
|
37,981.52
|
|
France
|
37,416.55
|
|
Germany
|
36,779.14
|
|
United
Arab Emirates
|
36,180.87
|
|
Japan
|
36,021.22
|
|
Singapore
|
32,082.02
|
|
Spain
|
31,726.55
|
|
New
Zealand
|
24,511.95
|
|
Greece
|
24,030.41
|
|
Israel
|
20,510.55
|
|
Portugal
|
19,287.51
|
|
Saudi
Arabia
|
16,612.16
|
|
Poland
|
9,214.27
|
|
Chile
|
8,335.70
|
|
Russia
|
8,183.02
|
|
Mexico
|
7,755.69
|
|
Argentina
|
6,548.80
|
|
Venezuela
|
6,393.99
|
|
Brazil
|
5,518.21
|
|
Peru
|
3,328.55
|
A
50 percent decline in the value of the dollar will simultaneously
increase interest rates, consumer prices and unemployment in the
United States, while causing stock and real estate prices to fall.
Consumption, which accounts for better than 70 percent of US GDP,
should collapse as a result, producing a significant recession. My
forecast is that US GDP will contract by at least 20 percent. (The
Fed may seek to mitigate the nominal decline with expansive monetary
policy, but such moves will only result in an even greater
contraction in real GDP.)
Assuming
a 50 percent decline in the value of the dollar and a 20 percent fall
in US GDP, the chart would now look something like this:
|
Luxembourg
|
183,853.25
|
|
Norway
|
152,895.56
|
|
Ireland
|
114,326.14
|
|
Switzerland
|
108,933.54
|
|
Iceland
|
107,064.94
|
|
Sweden
|
88,908.73
|
|
Netherlands
|
85,525.93
|
|
United
Kingdom
|
83,919.70
|
|
Canada
|
82,695.74
|
|
Australia
|
75,963.04
|
|
France
|
74,833.10
|
|
Germany
|
73,558.27
|
|
United
Arab Emirates
|
72,361.73
|
|
Japan
|
72,042.44
|
|
Singapore
|
64,164.05
|
|
Spain
|
63,453.11
|
|
New
Zealand
|
49,023.91
|
|
Greece
|
48,060.83
|
|
Israel
|
41,021.10
|
|
Portugal
|
38,575.02
|
|
United
States
|
36,868.12
|
|
Saudi
Arabia
|
33,224.32
|
|
Chile
|
16,671.40
|
|
Russia
|
16,366.03
|
|
Mexico
|
15,511.38
|
|
Argentina
|
13,097.61
|
|
Venezuela
|
12,787.97
|
|
Brazil
|
11,036.41
|
|
Peru
|
6,657.09
|
Obviously,
these projections are very rough. Not all foreign currencies will
rise in step and not all foreign GDPs will remain constant at today’s
levels in local currencies. However it is the concept that is
important. Notice how America falls from 6th place to
21st. America’s per capita GDP falls from 58
percent of Luxemburg’s, the top nation on the list, to a mere
20 percent. America’s per capita GDP falls from 14 times that
of Peru, the lowest nation on the list, to only 5.6 times.
China
is conspicuously absent from the list. Its current per capita GDP is
only about $2,200. However, were China to allow its currency to
float freely, my belief is that the yuan would rise far more
significantly than other currencies. I have no idea how much more
significantly that rise will be, but let us assume that its rise
against the dollar would be double the rate of the typical currency
in the Dollar Index. That would result in China’s per capita
GDP rising to $8,800, just above Peru’s but still below
Brazil’s.
Factoring
in China’s enormous population means that such a significant
rise in its per capita GDP would have a profound impact on global
consumption. Consider the following table, in billions of US
dollars, of the GDPs of the G-7 nations plus China:
|
United
States
|
13,928.462
|
|
Japan
|
4,599.358
|
|
Germany
|
3,036.853
|
|
China
|
2,871.019
|
|
United
Kingdom
|
2,552.655
|
|
France
|
2,370.843
|
|
Italy
|
1,949.878
|
|
Canada
|
1,357.073
|
Now
consider the table with my assumptions regarding exchange rates and a
20 percent decline in US GDP.
|
China
|
11,484.08
|
|
United
States
|
11,142.77
|
|
Japan
|
9,198.72
|
|
Germany
|
6,073.71
|
|
United
Kingdom
|
5,105.31
|
|
France
|
4,741.69
|
|
Italy
|
3,899.76
|
|
Canada
|
2,714.15
|
Under
this scenario, China supplants the United States as the world’s
largest economy, not in 30 or 40 years as is commonly believed, but
perhaps as soon as before the end of this decade. The US retains its
lead over Japan for second place, yet the margin declines from over
300 percent to just 10 percent. (My prediction is that the yen will
rise more significantly than most other currencies meaning that
Japan’s GDP will likely surpass US GDP as well.) Further, the
GDP of the 13 nations sharing the euro is currently about US$12.8
trillion. After the dollar’s decline it will rise to a
staggering US$25.6 trillion, more than twice that of the US. As a
result, considering the EU as a single nation, the US economy would
then rank fourth among the world’s largest, with its GDP
declining from 43 percent of world GDP to only 21 percent.
Current
ideology holds that a recession in the United States as severe as the
one I am forecasting would be catastrophic for the global economy.
But this short-sighted view overlooks the effects of such tremendous
dollar gains in the GDPs of the rest of the world. Wouldn’t
the increased consumption of everyone else offset the effects of the
decreased consumption of Americans? It is not as if factories around
the world would shut down if Americans stopped spending. All that
would change would be the nationality of the buyers.
As
American consumer spending declines, foreign spending will rise to
take its place. With an explosion in foreign purchasing power,
consumers around the world will see the dollar values of their
incomes and savings soar. Globally, goods will fall in price and
consumers around the world will snap up the bargains. Goods that
were formerly out of reach for many foreign consumers will now be
affordable. The reverse will occur in America. As production is
diverted away from poorer Americans to more affluent foreigners,
consumer prices in America will rise sharply. Goods that Americans
used to easily “afford” will now be out of reach.
As
gold surpasses $700 per ounce, oil tops $80 per barrel, and wheat
prices exceed $9 per bushel, Americans are already getting a taste of
things to come. Prices for these and other commodities are rising as
a direct result of the weakness in the dollar. As this weakness
intensifies in the months ahead, commodity price increases will
accelerate. However, as their own currencies rise, many foreign
buyers will actually experience price decreases. The result will be
even greater demand for commodities from abroad just as domestic
demand subsides.
Further,
as the world stops exporting so much of its savings to America, there
will be far more capital available to foreign entrepreneurs to invest
productively. Think of the crowding out effect of so much of the
world’s savings being lent to American consumers. Now imagine
the foreign investment boom that would follow as foreigners reclaim
access to their own savings.
The
American propensity to consume is not a unique talent. Any nation
can emulate it so long as it finds willing lenders and suppliers.
Production on the other hand is an entirely different matter. It
requires free markets, limited government, the rule of law, savings,
capital and hard work. The world economy will not be brought to its
knees simply because Americans stop consuming. Rather it is
America’s service sector economy that will collapse once the
rest of the world stops propping it up.
Peter
Schiff is President of Euro Pacific Capital, Inc. in Darien,
Connecticut.
|
The principal economic position has shifted from culture to culture throughout human history. Always with sets of internal struggles, redefinition and a difficultly in reconciling their own history.
But while the debates is quietly not fought out “in an independant media”nations traditionally not at the centre of the "consumerist domain" become the new centre of that and other domains. That shift has always realign capital, goods & services from one region/peoples to another.
Unfortunately in the US I have heard that this will ignite new American crisis after crisis while others enjoy the benefits of those shifts.
All the while company after company moves their head office to protect their shareholders and follow the market. Unfortunately even in today’s headlines much of Mr. Schiff's observations are no longer speculation...
The United States will never disappear but in 2010 it will not be what our parents built.